Siriusly Concerned: Animal Non-Belongingness in a Dichotomized Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/PANGEAS.18848Keywords:
literary animal studies, ecocriticism, science fiction, Stapledon, belonging, postmodernismAbstract
This article approaches Sirius (1944), by Olaf Stapledon, from a perspective that brings together literary animal studies and ecocriticism. The eponymous main character of this science fiction novel is a genetically-modified dog who struggles between the human and the animal realms, being unable to belong to either urban or natural spaces. I argue this work of fiction carries out an exercise of blurring boundaries, thus proposing alternatives for harmful binaries such as human-animal, city-nature, or divine-mundane. Each of these binaries is explored in three trips of the many this character experiences throughout the novel. This allows the main character to reflect on his peculiar, unique species as the singularity he is. Sirius claims it is only empathy that can help in such a task; both human and nonhuman animals are then able to rejoice in biological, cultural, and spiritual differences. Sirius’s trips are analyzed in order to look closely at (1) the dog’s reflections on humankind while being in London, (2) his becoming a wolf, dog, and human at the same time in the woods, and (3) music as the ideal tool to articulate one’s spirituality based on a reconnection with an almost lost biodiversity.References
AGAMBEN, G. (2004). The Open: Man and Animal. Meridian, crossing aesthetics; Variation: Meridian (Stanford, Calif.). Stanford: Stanford.
ALOI, G. (2012). "Beyond the Pain Principle.", in Charlie Blake, Claire Molloy, and Steven Shakespeare (eds.): Beyond Human: From Animality to Transhumanism. London: Continuum, 50-73.
ARMSTRONG, P., and SIMMONS, L. (2007). "Knowing Animals Bestiary: An Introduction", in Laurence Simmons and Philip Armstrong (eds.): Knowing Animals. Leiden: Brill, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004157736.i-296.7
BLAKE, C., MOLLOY, C., and SHAKESPEARE, S. (2012). Beyond Human: From Animality to Transhumanism. London: Continuum.
BOYARKINA, I. (2016). "Per Aspera Ad Astra. Conflicts and Challenges of Spirit in Sirius by Olaf Stapledon", in Postgraduate English, (33), 1-25.
BOYARKINA, I. (2018). "Utopia in the Histories of the Future by H. G. Wells and W. O. Stapledon", in Foundation (129), 6-19.
BULLIET, R. W. (2007). Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships. New York: Columbia.
BULLOCK, M. (2002). "Watching Eyes, Seeing Dreams, Knowing Lives", in Nigel Rothfels (ed.): Representing Animals. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 98-118.
COETZEE, J. M. (1999). The Lives of Animals. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
DELEUZE, G., and GUATTARI, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
DERRIDA, J., and WILLS, D. (2002). "The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow)", in Critical Inquiry, 28 (2). https://doi.org/10.1086/449046
FRANKLIN, A. (1999). Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. Wiltshire: SAGE.
HARAWAY, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
ITTNER, J. (2005). "Who's Looking? The Animal Gaze in the Fiction of Brigitte Kronauer and Clarice Lispector", in Mary Sanders Pollock, and Catherine Rainwater (eds.) Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave, 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09411-7_7
McGUIRK, C. (2008). "Science Fiction's Renegade Becomings", in Science Fiction Studies, 35 (105).
McHUGH, S. (2006). "One or Several Literary Animal Studies?", in H-Net, 16/07/2006.
NOLLMAN, J. (2010). "Field Studies: Ethics of Communication Research with Wild Animals", in Marc Bekoff. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Santa Barbara: Greenwood, 265-269.
RABKIN, E. S. (1982). "The Composite Fiction of Olaf Stapledon", in Science Fiction Studies, 9 (3), 238-248.
RAINWATER, C. (2005). "Who May Speak for the Animals? Deep Ecology in Linda Hogan's Power and A. A. Carr's Eye Killers", in Mary Sanders Pollock and Catherine Rainwater (eds.), Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 261-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09411-7_16
RICHTER, V. (2011). Literature After Darwin. Human Beasts in Western Fiction, 1859-1939. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230300446
SALZANI, C. (2017). "From Post-Human to Post-Animal Posthumanism and the 'Animal Turn'", in Lo Sguardo, 24 (II), 97-109.
SHAW, B. (2010). The animal fable in science fiction and fantasy. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
SMITH, J. A. (2005). "Sensory Experience as Consciousness in Literary Representations of Animal Minds", in Mary Sanders Pollock and Catherine Rainwater (eds.), Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Popular Culture. New York: Palgrave, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09411-7_14
STAPLEDON, O. (1944). Sirius: A Fantasy of Love and Discord. London: Orion.
SWANSON, R. A. (1982). The Spiritual Factor in "Odd John" and "Sirius", in Science Fiction Studies, 9 (3), 284-293.
UEXKÜLL, J. (1934). "A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds", in Claire H. Schiller (ed.), Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press, 4-80.
VINT, S. (2008). "The Animals in That Country: Science Fiction and Animal Studies", in Science Fiction Studies, 35 (105).
WEIL, K. (2010). "A Report on the Animal Turn", in Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2010-001
Downloads
Statistics
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jesús Fernández Caro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




