Development, validation, and application of the AAIIA scale (Acceptance and Self-Efficacy for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence) in the teaching of History and Literature among secondary school teachers in Spain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14198/ijd.28881

Keywords:

psychometric validation, artificial intelligence, secondary education, teaching history, teaching literature, in-service teachers, Spain

Abstract

This study aims, first and foremost, to validate the psychometric properties of the scale Acceptance and Self-Efficacy for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AAIIA) in the Teaching of History and Literature for its application in the Spanish context. This scale, specifically designed based on technological acceptance models and standardized psychometric guidelines, represents the first instrument to address the integrated use of AI in the curricular domains of History and Literature. Secondly, the study examines potential differences in knowledge, attitudes, readiness for AI use, and perceptions of its pedagogical impact according to three sociodemographic variables of secondary education teachers: gender, educational level, and geographical origin. The results confirm the bifactorial structure of the instrument, demonstrating adequate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.023, CFI = 0.982, TLI = 0.980) and high internal consistency (α = .928, ω = .866), providing evidence of its reliability and validity for application among Social Sciences and Literature educators in Spain. Furthermore, the findings reveal no statistically significant differences in the sociodemographic variables analyzed, except for gender. Men teachers exhibit significantly higher scores in knowledge, attitudes, readiness, confidence in their abilities, and motivation to integrate AI into their teaching practice. However, women teachers report the highest scores in their perception of AI’s pedagogical potential, particularly in its capacity to personalize learning, support the teaching process, facilitate assessment, and foster the development of critical thinking skills.

Funding

This research has been funded by the research project ‘The Nature of I-STEM (NoSTEM) for Civic Education’ (PID2020-118010RB-I00) [State Agency for Research - Ministry of Science and Innovation].

References

Ahmad, S., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212902

Cárdenas, M. & Arancibia, H. (2014). Potencia estadística y cálculo del tamaño del efecto en G*Power: complementos a las pruebas de significación estadística y su aplicación en psicología. Salud & Sociedad, 5(2), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2014.0002.00006

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Escobar-Perez, J. & Cuervo-Martinez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6, 27-36. http://ojs.uc.cl/index.php/RMCH/article/view/17122/14138

Feng, T. (2019). Cognitive function of artificial intelligence literature. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/573/1/012106

Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428

García Sánchez, O. V. (2023). Uso y percepción de ChatGPT en la educación superior. Revista de Investigación en Tecnologías de la Información, 11(23), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.36825/RITI.11.23.009

Gil Pascual, J. A. (2011). Técnicas e instrumentos para la recogida de información. UNED.

Goksel, N., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. In V. Sengupta (Ed.), Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism (pp. 283-303). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch014

Gómez-Trigueros, I. M., Ortega-Sánchez, D., & García Cobas, R. (2021). Brecha digital de género y coeducación: claves conceptuales y orientaciones metodológicas. McGraw-Hill-Aula Magna.

Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Humanity. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). McGraw Hill España

Ijaz, K., Bogdanovych, A., & Trescak, T. (2017). Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 904-929. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1225099

Kerlinger, F. & Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento: métodos de investigación en ciencias sociales. McGraw-Hill.

Lin, Y., Luo, Q., & Qian, Y. (2023). Investigation of artificial intelligence algorithms in education. Applied and Computational Engineering. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/16/20230886

Ma, L., & Yang, Y. (2023). An exploration of the precision path of integrating artificial intelligence technology into Japanese literature education. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01038

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación educativa. Pearson.

Morales-García, W. C., Sairitupa-Sanchez, L. Z., Morales-García, S. B., & Morales-García, M. (2024). Adaptation and psychometric properties of a brief version of the general self-efficacy scale for use with artificial intelligence (GSE-6AI) among university students. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1293437, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1293437

Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2023, 6 de octubre). Niveles de aceptación, comportamiento y uso de ChatGPT en el ámbito educativo: Análisis iberoamericano con estudiantes universitarios mexicanos. [conferencia]. I edición (2023-2024) del programa institucional 'Un experto habla...' (Universidad La Salle), Pachuca, México.

Osman, Z., Mohamad, R. K., & Kasbun, N. (2024). What Does it Take to Trigger Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence among Students in Higher Education Institutions? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(7), 1412-1429. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i7/22004

Rajapakse, C., Ariyarathna, W., & Selvakan, S. (2024). A self-efficacy theory-based study on the teachers' readiness to teach artificial intelligence in public schools in Sri Lanka. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3691354

Rincón, A. G., Serna, G. J., Flores, J. P., Quispe, H., Marcos, M. A., et al. (2023). Effect of chat GPT on the digitized learning process of university students. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.411

Rizvi, M. (2023). Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities. 2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), 01-03. https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA58378.2023.10156773

Sheng, X. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in history education of Chinese high schools. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4255

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students' perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access, 11, 38805-38818. hhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224

Slimi, Z. (2021). The impact of AI implementation in higher education on educational process future: A systematic review. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1081043/v1

Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., y Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33

Ubillos, S., del Líbano, M., & Ambrona, T. (2016). Estadística paramétrica. Universidad de Burgos.

Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tomte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). What explains teachers' trust in AI in education across six countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x

Zafari, M., Safari Bazargani, J., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Applications in K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179356

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhao, X. Q. (2022). Education challenges and coping mechanisms for artificial intelligence in primary and secondary schools. Science Insights. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.22.re083

Downloads

Statistics

Statistics RUA

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Pérez-González, C. (2025). Development, validation, and application of the AAIIA scale (Acceptance and Self-Efficacy for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence) in the teaching of History and Literature among secondary school teachers in Spain. Interdisciplinary Journal of Didactics, (2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.14198/ijd.28881

Issue

Section

Miscellany