Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and the European Higher Education Area (EHEA): reimagining equity in the university classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/ijd.32458Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, multiculturalism, racism, European higher education, discriminationAbstract
By late 2022, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots had gained significant traction and began raising questions about their impact on education. While technological advancements might appear objective and free from human bias due to their calculated precision, they often inherit the partialities embedded in their training data, which tend to reflect the inequities already present in society (Vicente and Matute, 2023). In the process towards a more diverse and inclusive technological society, the role and accountability of universities is essential. Biases related to racism, LGBTQ+phobia, xenophobia, sexism, or ableism can inadvertently seep into the educational process, negatively affecting students’ learning experiences. It is crucial for educators to recognize the potential dangers these technologies pose in the pursuit of a more equitable society and discrimination-free educational environments. Notwithstanding, AI-based tools also hold immense potential in enhancing the transmission of knowledge. This article explores the dual role of GenAI in higher education, particularly in addressing issues of multiculturalism and racial discrimination in the European university classroom. It studies GenAI’s potential to hinder and/or contribute to equity and casts light upon GenAI’s ability to help lecturers and students overcome prejudice. This article employs a qualitative integrative review methodology, synthesizing current scholarship on algorithmic bias with a critical policy analysis of the European Parliament’s 2024 AI Act and recent Eurydice reports (2022, 2023). This dual-layered approach allows for the identification of systemic gaps between macro-legal frameworks and micro-pedagogical needs in multicultural European Higher Education Area (EHEA) classrooms. Finally, the article proposes a series of challenges and considerations that universities must take into account when welcoming GenAI into their spaces.
Funding
Esta publicación es parte del proyecto de I+D+i PID2020-113190GB-C22, financiado por MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Ayuda FPU21/01836, financiada por MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.References
Amaya, A., Biemer, P. P., & Kinyon, D. (2020). Total error in a big data world: Adapting the TSE framework to big data. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 89-119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz056
BFUG Working Group on Social Dimension. (2024). Principles, guidelines and indicators of the social dimension of higher education: European Higher Education Area framework to strengthen the social dimension of higher education. Bologna Follow-Up Group. https://ehea.info/Immagini/BFUG_Board_BE_VA_87_WG_SD_4_4_1_Principles,_Guidelines,_Indicators.pdf
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29.
European Commission. (2017). A renewed EU agenda for higher education [Summary of Communication COM(2017) 247 final]. EUR-Lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/a-renewed-eu-agenda-for-higher-education.html
European Commission. (2026, February 20). AI Act | Shaping Europe's digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai.
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), Eurydice. (2022). Towards equity and inclusion in higher education in Europe: Eurydice report. Publications Office of the European Union.
European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA), Eurydice. (2023). Promoting diversity and inclusion in schools in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/846989
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence … (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance) (Regulation (EU) No. 2024/1689). Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1689. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/dc8116a1-3fe6-11ef-865a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Floridi, L. (2023). On good and evil, the mistaken idea that technology is ever neutral, and the importance of the double-charge thesis. Philosophy & Technology, 36(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00661-4
Future of Life Institute. (2024, February 27). High-level summary of the AI Act. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
Gentleman, A., & Horton, H. (2026, January 11). 'Add blood, forced smile': How Grok's nudification tool went viral. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2026/jan/11/how-grok-nudification-tool-went-viral-x-elon-musk
Grok. (n.d.). Grok. https://grok.com
Heyndels, S. (2023). Technology and neutrality. Philosophy & Technology, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00672-1
Howard-Hamilton, M. F., Cuyjet, M. J., & Cooper, D. L. (2023). Understanding multiculturalism and multicultural competence among college students. In Multiculturalism on campus (pp. 11-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446101-3
Kraft, A. (2016, March 25). Microsoft shuts down AI chatbot, Tay, after it turned into a Nazi. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/microsoft-shuts-down-ai-chatbot-after-it-turned-into-racist-nazi/
Lin, F., Mao, S., La Malfa, E., Hofmann, V., de Wynter, A., Yao, J., … Wei, F. (2024). One language, many gaps: Evaluating dialect fairness and robustness of large language models in reasoning tasks. Under review as a conference paper at International Conference on Learning Representations 2025. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.317
UNESCO survey: Two-thirds of higher education institutions have or are developing guidance on AI use. (2025). Retrieved March 17, 2026, from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-two-thirds-higher-education-institutions-have-or-are-developing-guidance-ai-use
Uğraş, H., Uğraş, M., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2024). ChatGPT-Supported Education in Primary Schools: The Potential of ChatGPT for Sustainable Practices. Sustainability, 16(22), 9855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229855
Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023). Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42384-8
Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Celia Cores-Antepazo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


